If we're talking about a command you can run at the shell prompt, there should be a manual page: First find out which package the program belongs to: The pattern is the same as for RPM. First, find out who owns the file: The pattern is the same as above: Then to get more info about somepackage: It, too, shares the same usage pattern as the above systems: If you have a program installed via Ports , and you can figure out which Port installed it, you can probably get what you want with this: Warren Young Warren Young Backticks work just as well in as they did in , when they were introduced by the original Bourne shell.
But don't yell at people when they use backticks in a perfectly sensible way, as above. To do otherwise is to make a religious issue out of a technical one. Perhaps "superseded" implies that backticks are deprecated, which they are not. In which case the author should edit that.
- Your Answer?
- What is a Unix Executable File? Why is it doing this?!
- how to update mac os x 10.10.
It still remains good info for users to have in It just baldly states the author's opinion that backticks shouldn't be used any more, which you have parroted. The newer style isn't universally better. It takes twice as many keystrokes, if you count the Shift.
Open document that was sent as Unix Executable File? | MacRumors Forums
If those extra keystrokes don't buy you anything, I say go ahead and continue to use backticks. When an experienced member told me about it in a comment here, I found it to be a helpful, often preferred, alternative I've used many times since. I'm just paying it forward. When I open it up in Sublime Text, all I get is unreadable machine code. However, when I open up a different Unix executable file—in my case, a shell script I had just written, but there are others—I am able to open up the file in Sublime Text and view the contents of the script.
I have checked the permissions for both files, and they are the same.
Why is there different behavior when opening up some files? Executable files may be scripts in which case you can read the text , or binaries which are ELF formatted machine code. Your shell script is a script; git is an ELF binary. You can use the file command to see more detail. For example, on my nearest Linux system:.
- open Unix Executable Files or Executable Files | Mac Forums.
- mac os x mail rules;
- how to reduce image size powerpoint mac.
- Open document that was sent as Unix Executable File??
Presumably, they are data. If you want OS to assign a type to them, give them a suffix. If you want them to be treated as HDV files, give them the suffix '. Generally speaking, it's not worth the effort to attempt recover things like HDV files. Chances are pretty good that they are unreadable. View answer in context.